* Is this an accurate article? *
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surfing
I found that all the relevant data was there on the subject, and even some more cool stuff about the Wave Intensity Classification where the speed of the wave is measured by the "peel line" of the barrel. Seems accurate!


Does it cover all the basic facts that you'd need to understand this topic?*
It covers a fair range of principles on the subject.

Does this article follow the wikipedia guidelines for useful articles?*
There were some usefull tips and general information which was good.

Is this article fair and balanced, or is it biased towards a particular side or argument?
There is no biase, and it was a well balanced article.

What changes would i make to this article to improve it and make it useful for the wider wikipedia community?
For myself on this article, I would add some information about how to go about learning the sport, lessons etc.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Defence_Force
* Is this an accurate article? *
This is a very good article. All the stats for personelle are there; serving and in reserve.
As well as all the hardware that we currently use.

Does it cover all the basic facts that you'd need to understand this topic?*
It covers more than you need to know, mabye to much.

Does this article follow the wikipedia guidelines for useful articles?*
And then some.
Is this article fair and balanced, or is it biased towards a particular side or argument?
This article is all about one thing the Defence Forces, it's all good.

What changes would you make to this article to improve it and make it useful for the wider wikipedia community?
I Would add this link to the Defence Force Website, There's a lot of good info here.